Miscellaney

The trouble with work is that it tends to get in the way of hobbies, kind of like this blog. I was in San Luis Obispo this week, and I found myself with out a lot of time to write. The result is another crappy bullet point post.

4 game Fun
So the Tigers have been battling the weather, and losing. Fortunately, they’ve been battling their opponents and winning. The result if a 4 game, six day win streak. Without changing tactics, the Tigers have suddenly figured out how to win close games. Their wins include an extra inning one run game, another one run win, a two run win, and a blowout.

Finally, Trammell’s plan for a Farnsworth 7th, Urbina 8th, and Percival 9th came to fruition in last night’s contest. The 3 relievers protected a one run lead over the last 3 innings.

During the 4 game stretch, the Tigers starters have an ERA of 3.03, a K/9 of 7.1, and K/BB ratio of 3:1. The last two numbers are especially impressive considering that Mike Maroth pitched two of the games.

Top Heavy
Last night the Tigers’ first 5 hitters were a combined 7 for 18 for a .389/.450/.556 night. On the other hand, the bottom 4 hitters were a combined 0 fer 14 with 6 strikeouts (half of which belonged to Carlos Pena). The only offensive bright spot for the Tigers bottom hitters was a Craig Monroe sacrifice fly.

The good news is that the top of the order continues to produce. Brandon Inge, Ivan Rodriguez, Carlos Guillen, Rondell White, and Dmitri Young are a combined .354/.401/.551 with 82 runs created.

Picking their spots
Alan Trammell’s troops ahve only attempted 9 stolen bases this year, and they’ve been successful on all but one attempt. Conversely, opponents have tried 18 times to run on the Tigers, but have been gunned down 56% of the time.

Justin Time
So this Verlander kid might just work out. In last night’s start he through seven innings of two hit ball, striking out 12 against two walks.

The Pocket Schedule

A reader recently sent me a Tiger artifact he happened to come across. It is a pristine Tigers pocket schedule from 1972. Aside from this being a very thoughtful gesture from a generous stranger, the pocket schedule is a great way to look back in baseball time.

I scanned in the schedule, and the pictures are below.

The first thing I really noticed is how plain and simple it was. It had only 3 panels, front and back, and could easily fit in your wallet. It is a far cry from the 2005 pocket schedule. The 2005 edition is glossy and has Pudge on the front. It is four panels with an extra horizontal fold that makes it almost the size of a sheet of paper. While the newer version is much bigger, the only piece of additional relevant information is a seating chart.

The 1972 schedule also brought back memories of the old Tiger in the circle logo which was classic. The schedule itself also denotes the long since defunct “Ladie Day.” It also had schedule doubleheaders, Twi-night and conventional. Make sure to take note of the ticket prices, because if you had $4 you could buy yourself a box seat. You could by that seat either in person, by mail-order, or at the store formerly known as Hudsons.

I don’t remember when the Tigers abandoned the simple 3 panel schedule, but I wish they’d go back to it. The newer ones are just too bulky with too much wasted space. Unforunately, the chances of that happening are probably only slightly better than the chances of them returning to $4 box seats.

In any case, I just wanted to share this with you and thank Vern who sent it to me.

One Run Bummin

With the Tigers dropping to 0-5 in one run games this year, the fans are getting restless. Exacerbating the situation is the fact that the Tigers were 12-27 last year in one run contests. Of course it is necessary to assign blame. Typically success or failure in close games is attributed to the bullpen, the manager, clutch hitting, and luck. While there maybe some element to each of those, I’m more inclined to attribute it too luck. Also, the other tenet that is always voiced is that “good teams win those close games.” But is that true?

Using data from Retrosheet, I looked at every team’s performance in one run games from 1970 to 1993. The result is 903 team-seasons of data to look at. The first thing I wanted to look at was if good teams, that is teams with high winning percentages, performed well in one run games as well. The chart below shows a plot of one-run winning percentage against overall winning percentage.

You can see that there is a linear trend, and the resulting correlation is .57. (here’s a primer on correlations: two sets of data are compared and given a score. The score is between -1 and 1. The closer the number is to -1 or 1, the stronger the correlation. A value of 0 indicates no correlation) Of course a corerlation would be expected because the record in one run games contributes to the overall winning percentage. On average teams have one-quarter to one-third of their games be decided by a run or fewer, so the correlation makes sense.

To look at it another way, I plotted each one-run winning percentage against non one-run winning percentage.

This graph lacks any sort of linear relationship. The correlation between the two is non existent with a r-squared of .085 (EDIT: I rechecked and the R-squared value is .29. So the relationship isn’t non-existent, just weak). My interpretation of this is that the teams that fare well in the majority of their games are the better teams. The fact that there isn’t a relationship between the performance in one run games and non one run games leads me to believe that good teams aren’t defined by their performance in the close ones. Good teams can have great seasons by performing well in one run games (ie the 1984 Tigers were 104-58 overall, and 25-11 in one-run games). Similarly a marginal team can have a good season by performing well in tight games. From this it seems that teams are deemed good by winning close games, and not that teams win close games because they are good.

The thing to remember with one run games, is that both teams are within a run of the win. Because the games are tight a lot of emphasis is placed on managerial moves at the end of the game, the performance of the bullpen, and clutch hitting. Given that there will always be tradeoffs. Did a team that came back from a deficit do so because of their clutch hitting or a failure of the other team’s bullpen? Where do you assign credit or blame? Similarly with managerial moves, the manager can call the correct strategy only to have the players fail to execute it. On the other hand, the manager can make some bad decisions that payoff. Luckily there is something easy we can turn to: luck.

If the ability to win close games was a skill, one would expect teams to be able to repeat it year to year. While personnel and managers may change from season to season, teams generally return largely intact. Using this assumption, I took a look at if there was a correlation between a team’s performance one year and the subsequent year.

As you can see there is no correlation from one year to the next. The r-squared value of .040. I also looked to see if things were more correlated out at the extremes, like the ability for a really good or bad one-run team to repeat their performance. Even at the extremes there was no correlation (~ .075). This leads me to believe that performance in one run games has more to do with luck and less to do with skill.

So what does this mean for the Tigers who’s .325 one-run winning percentage was the 13th worst since 1970? Since it is pretty rare for a team to perform that badly once, chances are the Tigers will do better. Of the 83 teams who had a one-run winning percentage less than .400, only 4 were worse the following season. In fact, of those 83, forty of them posted a .500 or better winning percentage in one-run games the following year. Now the Tigers 0-5 start this season has put them in a hole for finishing over .500, but the Tigers stand a good chance of improving over last year. Furthermore, much of it will come down to luck as opposed to a failure of the offense, bulllpen, or the manager.

B. Inge-ing

So do you believe in Brandon Inge yet? I have to admit that I was highly skeptical that he could pick up where he left off last year. I didn’t expect him to slide all the way back to his .200 batting average ways, but I certainly didn’t expect the 375/453/607 line he’s posted to date. Now this year represents a very small sample, and last year could have been a fluke, but it could also be that Inge has achieved a new performance level.

In June 2003 Inge was demoted to AAA Toledo. When Baseball America named Inge the top Tigers’ prospect in 2001 it was for his defense rather than his offense, but no major leaguer can play good enough defense to compensate for the 155/225/275 he was hitting that season.

While in AAA Inge managed to post a more acceptable 275/327/444. The Tigers recalled him in August and he responded with a 12 game hitting streak. Inge decided to abandon thinking after speaking with a sports psychologist and focus on hitting the ball up the middle. He finished up the season hitting 258/308/404. While his offensive performance still wasn’t great, it was a far cry from his anemic performance in the past.

Using Inge’s 2003 AAA event as the breaking point, I went to the Baseball Musings Day-by-Day Database and looked at Inge’s career numbers before and after the demotion.


AB BA OBP SLG HR BB SO

Old Inge 677 .183 .242 .292 11 45 187
New Inge 624 .285 .341 .452 19 52 120

When looking at the New and Old Inge, I’m not so sure that Inge’s success last year and this year can be dismissed because of sample size. New Inge now has only 50 at-bats fewer than Old Inge. He also has increased his batting average .102, his on base percentage .099, and his slugging .160. He’s walking slightly more and striking out significantly less.

So is Inge just hitting better, or are there other factors at work? Well, Comerica Park brought in the left field fence which may have contributed to the home run increase. While the dimension changes didn’t occur at the same break point, the New Inge was never subjected to the huge distances the Old Inge was.

Early in his career, Inge was playing every day as the starting catcher. In 2003 and 2004 he was used more in a platoon situation so he may have benefited from facing fewer righthanders and more lefthanders. The following table shows the percentage of at-bats that Inge had against southpaws each year, and the corresponding OPS against each type of pitcher.


AB % Left L OPS R OPS

2002 321 22% .684 .585
2003 330 33% .761 .527
2004 408 41% .916 .708

While last year he did get a substantial amount of at-bats against lefties, and he did perform significantly better against lefties, his performance against both lefties and righties was markedly improved.

The other possible explanation is that catching was detracting from Inge’s offense. I have to admit that I thought the plan to turn Inge into a uber-utility guy last year was ridiculous. I couldn’t fathom why they were looking for a spot on the field for his bat. Of course I didn’t expect his offense outpouring. Even during last year’s offense boom, he posted only a .690 OPS while catching. It could be the physical drain of catching, as well as the mental drain of calling a game may have been taking a toll.

I think it’s safe to say that Inge is doing more than riding a hot streak. He did benefit last year from his mix of pitcher handedness, and he may be benefiting from being displaced by Pudge behind the plate. He also happened to develop a new approach at the plate that coincided with these other events. While his minor league history doesn’t support an offensive outburst, Inge is only 27 so improvement is certainly possible.

I know Brandon Inge won’t continue to hit as well as he has this season. However, given his strong start I’m much more confident that he can repeat last year’s performance and even improve upon it than I was 3 weeks ago.

K-Less

We knew going into the season that the Tigers’ pitching staff wouldn’t be a strikeout heavy staff. Bonderman as the ace would pile up quite a few, and Nate Robertson would be okay. But we knew that Jason Johnson at best was near average and Maroth and Ledezma would be below average. That’s why after the opening series against the Royals when the team piled up 24 strikeouts against 3 walks over the 3 games, things were looking pretty good. (Even if it was the Royals). Unfortunately in the 11 games since that series, the Tigers’ staff only has 51 strikeouts.

The starters in particular have been having a hard time getting K’s. In those 11 games the rotation has only accounted for 29 strikeouts or a K/9 of 4.26. Bonderman has struck out the most batters with 9 in two apperances, but his resulting K/9 is only 5.79. Jason Johnson hasn’t struck out a batter since his first apperance on April 7th (granted in one of his two apperances since, he only retired one batter). As Danny Knobler pointed out Johnson was the first Tiger to win a game without recording a strikeout since Nate Cornejo did it in 2003. Johnson wasn’t the only starter to make a K-less appearance for the Tigers this season though. When Nate Robertson was battling a virus and was roughed up by the Twins he failed to record a strikeout in 5 innings of work despite allowing 5 walks and two hit batsmen.

So why is the strikeout so important? Because it is the only out that pitchers have complete control over. It’s the only out that minimizes bad luck. If you look to the first game of the Minnesota series, Ugueth Urbina might have gotten out of the inning if a hard chopper into the ground didn’t take a turf bounce over the head of Brandon Inge. Even the Tigers benefited from this as Omar Infante drove in a run on a broken bat blooper. It’s also an out that pretty much ensures a runner won’t advance. Looking again at the Minnesota game, Jamie Walker got Jacque Jones to hit a weak grounder to second. Unfortunately there was a runner on third who scored on the play.

While putting more pressure on the defense is never a good thing, it is especially true of a defense that wasn’t expected to be that good. Fortunately, the Tigers defense hasn’t been bad. While the Tigers have 12 errors as a team, 3 have been by pitchers. And of those errors, only two have allowed runners to reach base (which is actually fewest in the AL). Their defensive efficiency, which is the percentage of balls in play that are converted to outs is .7107. That’s slightly above the league average of .6976 and 6th best in the AL.

Also fortunate for the Tigers, is that the starters have been pretty stingy allowing walks as well. While Nate Robertson has struggled and has a K/BB ratio of 1.0, the remaining starters have a ratio of 3.27. Robertson alone has accounted for 8 of the starters’ 19 walks. As long as the staff can supress the walks, it will help mitigate the low strike out rate.

Looking forward I’d expect Jeremy Bonderman to increase his strike out rate. He’s had higher rates in the past, and he has looked good enough this season for it to continue. Mike Maroth will probably stay about the same – he’s just not a strike out guy. Jason Johnson should improve slightly. He’s a little below his career numbers. However, if he can keep inducing ground balls with his sinker/two-seamer that isn’t a bad way to go either. Ledezma struck out quite a few guys at Erie last year, but was about a 5k/9 pitcher at the major league level. He clearly is still developing so I’m not sure where he’ll end up. Nate Robertson is the starter I’m most concerned with. His strikeout rate was very high early in the season (8.1 K/9 through June 30th), but it faded as the season wore on last year (6.1 K/9 from July 1st on). That combined with his struggles early this year has me a little worried. The good news is that this is only through three starts and he could just be in a slump. However, it is something to keep an eye on as the season progresses.

References: All the data points that refer to anything over a given time period came from the Day by Day Database. A creation of Baseball Musings mastermind David Pinto.

Catching up

The tough thing about not having time to write everyday, is that when I come back, so much can happen. In this case, the Tigers lost Magglio Ordonez for a couple months, Farnsworth developed a strained bicep, Urbina combusted again, Trammell was slammed for his bullpen utilizaztion, Bonderman turned things around with an ace like performance, and Urbina managed a scoreless outing for the first time this season. So what is the topic for discussion? With a relatively light workday today, I’ll try all of it.

Bonderman, Maroth and the Bullpen
With the rotation of Bonderman, Maroth, Johnson, Robertson, and Ledezma it seemed apparent that the bullpen would be working extensively during the back of the rotation, and recovering when Bonderman and Maroth were on the mound. While Trammell helped to cause some of the fatigue by pulling Maroth too early in Minnesota, I’m sure he was planning on Jason Johnson pitching at least throught the first inning the subsequent night. Add a rough outing by Nate Robertson and you have a bullpen that pitched 14 of the 24 1/3 innings in the Twins series.

After a solid six inning effort from Wil Ledezma, both Bonderman and Maroth came in this weekend and pitched into the 8th inning when the pen needed it most. For Bonderman it was another step on his continuing journey to become an elite pitcher. For Maroth, it was just another outing where he went deep into the game and kept his team in it.

Ugh Ugueth Urbina
So what to do with Urbina? The good news is that he struckout all 4 hitters he faced in Sunday’s game. The bad news is that was the first outing this year in that he hasn’t allowed a run. With this last outing hopefully he turned the corner. While Urbina isn’t a dominant closer, he still has a pretty good track record of success. For the time being I still think he is the set-up man, even if it causes me to hold my breath when he comes in the game.

Searching for a lead-off hitter
I’m not convinced that this is really an issue. The Tigers don’t have a prototypical leadoff hitter, but I don’t really see it hurting production. They are still scoring 5.8 runs per game. Part of the problem is that Infante’s numbers are much more reminiscent of 2003 than 2004. However, as long as Inge continues to hit well there isn’t a problem with Brandon at the top of the order.

Of course if you wanted to put somebody at the top of the order who got on base 43.5% of the time, you could always put Carlos Pena up there. While he’s not hitting real well, he’s seeing over 4 pitches per at-bat, and he has 12 walks against only 6 strikeouts. His proficiency at getting on base has probably contributed to Craig Monroe’s 11 RBI (as well as his 3 double plays). I’m not advocating this move, because I think Pena will start to hit better, and I like his chances of doing that better with less pressure lower in the order. However, it’s something to consider.

Extra base-less opinion
Lost amidst the pitching debacle in the Metrodome, the Tigers bats were pretty anemic during the Twins series. While the Tigers amassed 27 hits over the 3 games, only 6 were for extra bases (3 doubles and 3 homers). The result was a .386 slugging percentage. Combine that with a 24 to 6 strikeout to walk ratio and you realize that even without the bullpen collapse, the Tigers would have been lucky to win any games. (I know that the first game they had a lead and it the game was theirs to lose. My point is that the whole team didn’t really play well enough to win)

Herniated Contract
At this point there isn’t really a lot to add to the Magglio Ordonez hernia discusssion. The Tigers have outfield options and will be able to survive. The offesne is already strong, it just won’t be uber-strong without Ordonez. The biggest implication is that with him missing a couple of months due to the hernia it all but guarantees that the out clause won’t kick in. With him having a shortened season, it will put less stress on the knee, and make it less susceptible to injury. I wasn’t rooting for the guy to injure his knee, but the hernia pretty much insures that Ordonez will be in Detroit for at least the next 5 years.

As for the hernia injury itself, a hernia pretty much wiped out Dmitri’s 2002 season. The difference is that Young tried unsuccessfully to rehab it before finally undergoing surgery. Ordonez on the other hand is consulting two specialists and will probably have surgery within a week.

Righty-righty matchup
The Tigers’ right hand heavy lineup faced their first left handed starter this season in Brian Anderson. For the season, the Tigers only have 80 at-bats against left handed pitchers, and they haven’t fared well posting a 203/264/278 line.

The Summer of 1935
Tigerblog has started to do a retrospective look at the 1935 season. Follow the team as Greenberg, Gehringer, and Cochrange lead the team toward the first championship in franchis history.

The night I spent with a Twins fan…

Okay, so the title may make this sound more sordid than it really is. Seth Stohs from SethSpeaks and I were both online and chatted throughout the course of the game. Seth has the first part of the transcript up on his site, and I have the second part below. In the first part we talk about the slimmed down Pudge and whether he is the best catcher of all time, Tigers’ outfield dilemmas, and productive outs among other things. The following picks up right after Brandon Inge hit the shot back at Radke that resulted in a double play in the fifth inning…

Bill: This series just hasn’t been any fun
SethSpeaks: it is fun for Twins fans who read Dmitri Young’s comments on how the AL Central would be a two team race between the Tigers and Indians!
Bill: Yeah, that’s Dmitri. He’s kind of…shall we say reckless?
SethSpeaks: He’s known as one of the good guys in the game, from everything I’ve heard, but it just wasn’t a smart comment.
Bill: This is the same guy that barreled into John Flaherty…the first week of spring training
SethSpeaks: ha! So, there’s not always a lot of thought put into things he does or says!?
Bill: Correct. He has lots of enthusiasm.
Bill: He’s a good guy. He’s fun to have around. He loves the game, loves his teammates. But then he says some off the wall stuff
Bill: Wow. [Ed: Monroe saves HR]
SethSpeaks: Nice catch. You described him perfectly.
Bill: He and Torii are good friends, and supposedly Hunter has been helping him with his transition to center
SethSpeaks: that is a good person to have help learn to play CF
Bill: The Detroit broadcast was showing Torii in the dugout, and he was grinning
SethSpeaks: Torii in awesome! Always smiling. I’ve heard nothing but great things about him as a teammate.
SethSpeaks: Jones has been good against left-handers. He’ll take a few awful swings, but then does something.
SethSpeaks: And, Lew Ford can FLY!

Bill: Omar seemed to get nothing on that relay throw. His shoulder was hurting this spring. I wonder if it’s still bothering him
SethSpeaks: that was tailor-made.
Bill: I was still nervous with Guillen’s knee as he ran across the bag with the guy sliding in
SethSpeaks: yeah, something didn’t quite look right.
SethSpeaks: That was a shot! And Pudge just showed some serious speed!

Bill: Finally something that went right
SethSpeaks: It seems like the Twins have been dominating, but we’re just one Big-Fly from a one-run game!
Bill: The Tigers just haven’t been able to get the big flyball when they’ve been trailing this year
SethSpeaks: And Radke is getting the “corners” now!!
SethSpeaks: Even Blyleven is admitting that!

Bill: Yeah, Robertson hasn’t gotten that tonight
SethSpeaks: Yeah, but Robertson hasn’t “earned” it, so to speak. If you’re close all the time, you’ll get some calls. If you’re all over the place, you’re not going to get any umpire help.
Bill: Can’t argue with that
Bill: I’ve read how Koufax used to expand the strike zone through out a game. He’d start on the corners, and just keeping moving a half inch off
SethSpeaks: Makes a lot of sense. I mean, Greg Maddux would be the perfect example of expanding the strike zone.
Bill: Carlos has hit the ball hard twice tonight with nothing to show for it
Bill: Robertson doesn’t have a strike out tonight
SethSpeaks: that has to be unusual.
Bill: He’s at 96 pitches. I have a feeling he’ll start the inning
Bill: But is gone with the first baserunner
SethSpeaks: Makes sense, as long as he is OK to do that.
SethSpeaks: But Farnsworth is in.

Bill: Or maybe he won’t start the inning
SethSpeaks: Seemed like the Cubs were doing anything to get rid of him this winter. He must be a headcase or something.
SethSpeaks: A headcase who throws 100!
Bill: Thats what it sounds like. But Bob Cluck should be a good fit for him
SethSpeaks: he could be helpful. His ‘gas’, followed by the Urbina change up, and then Percival… that could be very good.
Bill: Everybody in Detroit is calling for him to be the setup man
SethSpeaks: instead of Urbina?
Bill: Yep. Urbina hasn’t pitched well yet this year
SethSpeaks: it’s only like 8 games in… he’ll be fine. He just isn’t a hard-thrower.
SethSpeaks: I like Rivas when he just hits line drives to RF. So many times, he tries to do too much and flies out a lot.
SethSpeaks: Good AB by Castro. Take two fastballs right down the middle and then pop up instead of advancing the runners!

Bill: If you’re thinking bunt, what was wrong with that first pitch
SethSpeaks: Exactly!
SethSpeaks: Mr. Double Play is up now… Torii always seems to hit into double-plays.

Bill: A guy that’s fast, but can’t get out of the batters box?
SethSpeaks: It’s not that. He does swing down on the ball a lot, hits a lot of hard ground balls, and that just means that it is condusive to double plays. Kirby Puckett used to hit into a lot of DPs too.
SethSpeaks: A lot of hard ground balls with runners on base, there is a chance.

Bill: But hard ground balls on the turf isn’t a bad strategy either
SethSpeaks: No, you just hit the way you hit and take your chances.
SethSpeaks: It’s like Carlos Silva. He throws a lot of strikes and gets a lot of ground balls. He’ll get a lot of ground outs, a lot of double plays, and sometimes, he’ll give up a lot of hits.

Bill: Speaking of Kirby, what do you think about some of the accusations and allegations from the last couple years?
SethSpeaks: my opinion has basically been that there was no way you could prove any wrong doing legally. But it completely tarnished his image, an image that he spent a lot of time trying to develop.
SethSpeaks: LEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWw

Bill: Well, that should quell some of the Farnsworth for setup sentiment
SethSpeaks: Yeah, I’m thinking that won’t help.
Bill: Well I hope the Royals don’t get as pissed about Young’s comments as the Twins did
SethSpeaks: Honestly, I don’t really think it would matter!
SethSpeaks: And who knows how this series goes if Bonderman would have pitched a game.
Bill: But, Grienke has looked good. And Runyelvs Hernandez looked great his first game
SethSpeaks: point well made. It all comes down to pitching.
Bill: The Royals still don’t have the offense, but if those two guys can keep them in games, anything can happen
Bill: Not that they’ll compete
SethSpeaks: I like Ruben Gotay and David DeJesus.
Bill: I do like DeJesus
SethSpeaks: Sweeney is completely over-rated.
Bill: I would have expected that if the Tigers were swept, Nathan would have been somehow involved
Bill: It looks like he won’t even pitch in this series
SethSpeaks: Yeah, he isn’t getting any Save opportunities.
SethSpeaks: Jesse Crain is in the game. Surprising.
SethSpeaks: A nice inning. He needs that.
Bill: I have to imagine that Urbina will be coming in now
Bill: This isn’t smart. German pitched 3 innings yesterday
SethSpeaks: He is a big man, but hasn’t he had arm problems in the past too?
Bill: Not arm problems, control problems.
Bill: He’s lights out at AAA, but can’t throw a strike at the major league level
SethSpeaks: as evidenced by the 4 pitch walk
SethSpeaks: so many people think Rivas is fast. He is not fast down the line at all.

Bill: So how is it that the Twins have so many quality bloggers?
SethSpeaks: it must be the excellent education in Minnesota!?
SethSpeaks: I really don’t know, but there are a lot of really good ones that I read every day!
SethSpeaks: I think that the Twins Geek and Aaron Gleeman have made everyone want to be like them!

Bill: I typically don’t read other team blogs on a daily basis, but I always read you, TG, Gleeman, and of course Batgirl
SethSpeaks: well, I appreciate it!
Bill: John’s been doing it a real long time. He’s really the model for half the bloggers out there
SethSpeaks: I completely agree with you!
SethSpeaks: Now we get to see Matt Guerrier.

Bill: I know nothing about him, educate me
SethSpeaks: Well, he came ot the Twins organization a couple of years ago. He came up for a couple of starts last year, but wasn’t good. He wasn’t expected to make the team, but he had a great spring, and was out of options.
Bill: 6 more of those [Ed.: Solo HR by White] and we’re right back in it
SethSpeaks: ha ha
SethSpeaks: You know, it’s too bad that we couldn’t have done this with a decent ball game! Not much to talk about!

Bill: Tuesday’s game would have been more interesting
SethSpeaks: Definitely. That was a fun game to watch!
Bill: well sort of
Bill: fun in an excruciating sort of way
SethSpeaks: point well made
SethSpeaks: Hopefully Corky Miller will be let go in the next few weeks.

Bill: Did Munson go to Rochester, or is he out of the organization
SethSpeaks: Munson was just let go. I believe he signed a minor league deal with Tampa Bay, and I haven’t heard anything more since then.
Bill: Ah, where all released Tigers go…Florida
SethSpeaks: yeah, exactly! Can you say Damian Easley!?
Bill: Damion Easley, Rob Fick, Alex Sanchez
Bill: Todd Jones and Brian Moehler are playing for Florida now as well
SethSpeaks: Yeah, I was thinking Easley because he’s played for both Tampa and Florida
Bill: It’s just a matter of time until Higginson is hitting cleanup for one of those teams
SethSpeaks: That will be funny!
SethSpeaks: Has Urbina made any mention of wanting to be traded, or wanting the closer’s role?

Bill: Sort of
Bill: Apparently he told some NY reporters that he wants to go where he can close
SethSpeaks: can’t really blame him.
Bill: But he also said he wants to play for the Tigers, and he understands why they signed Percival
SethSpeaks: I can completely see both sides of that.
Bill: Good thing the bill of Rondell’s cap took the brunt of the impact with the wall
SethSpeaks: with White’s history, you always worry!
SethSpeaks: Lew is having a good day. He needs that. He hasn’t had a lot of hits yet this year.

Bill: The Tigers thought they’d save their tired bullpen by only pitching 8 innings tonight
SethSpeaks: yeah, much better than the 8 2/3 last night!
Bill: Well, congratulations
Bill: That was a brutal series
SethSpeaks: thanks!! I didn’t have much to do with it, but I’ll take any credit you want to pass my way!
SethSpeaks: it was fun!
Bill: maybe we can do it again later this season
Bill: like when the Tigers are in Minn for the last series of the year to decide the division
SethSpeaks: i think it would be fun!
SethSpeaks: that works… I’m sure we’d have plenty to talk about.

I enjoyed doing this because I learned more about the Twins, and I got to hear an outsiders’ perspective on the Tigers. Plus, it kept me from having to write about a 4 game losing streak (not explicitly anyways). I hope that you guys enjoy it too.

Back away from the ledge

Yes, I know last night’s game was terribly frustrating. The Tigers lost their third one run game of the season. Clearly what we need to do is panic first, and then assign blame. I think that the common responses are that it was Urbina’s fault for blowing the lead, and Trammell’s fault for burning through his pen. Let’s look a little closer at those assumptions.

Urbina
OK, so it’s hard to defend Ugie here. Uribnia has pitched poorly enough this season to make people stop complaining about Bobby Higginson – which is quite a feat. While he did induce a couple weak bouncers, one of which took a turf hop, he also allowed two walks and a long fly ball to the warning track.

Now what should the Tigers do with Urbina? The popular mantra is “Trade him.” I’m not against trading Urbina, but not right now. While the bullpen should be a strength, I’m not convinced yet. German, Farnsworth, and Ginter (in his one appearance) have looked sharp. However German doesn’t have a strong history to convince me he can continue to pitch at this level. Farnsworth has looked great before only to erupt. And Ginter, well he won’t be your high leverage guy. Walker has been and will be adequate in the lefy specialist role. That leaves Percival, who has a history of being good, and a more recent history of being ok and injured. Despite Urbina’s struggles, given the other question marks in the bullpen the Tigers still need him.

Now demoting him from the set-up role for a game or two might be a consideration, but I doubt Trammell will do it in the near term.

Trammell’s Managing
While Trammell may have turned to the bullpen too early, and too frequently, his early moves paid off. German came in and picked up an out and induced a comebacker to the mound (which he failed to field cleanly). Walker came into face Jacque Jones who struggles against lefties, and induced a weak grounder to second. Of course it scored the run but it wasn’t the fault of Walker. Farnsworth came in and looked very good for an inning and a third.

Trammell then went with Urbina in the 8th, as he had to do. Urbina is the set-up man, and Trammell probably wanted to get him out there in a high leverage situation so he could bounce back from Friday. It didn’t work. Trammell came back with his closer in the 9th, which he had to do. He certainly couldn’t send Urbina back out there, and his other option was Matt Ginter. Nothing against Ginter, but Trammell went with the guy who gave him the best shot to get his hitters up again. It didn’t work.

Trammell put each of his pitchers in with a chance to succeed, and both Urbina and Percival didn’t execute. While I think he went to the pen to early, once he took Maroth out I didn’t mind his moves at all.

The move that really bothered me was sacrifice bunting in the 5th inning. The Tigers had already scored two runs on Monroe’s homer. Inge drew a walk to put a runner at first and nobody out. Mays was looking shaky. At this point color man Rod Allen said, “I’d have Infante lay down a bunt here. Trammell knows that he has to score as many runs as he can against the Twins.” I was thinking to myself how ridiculous that statement was when Infante squared to bunt. Now Infante got the bunt down and successfully advanced Inge, who ultimately was stranded at third.

The problem is that Trammell let a pitcher who was on the ropes have a free out, and in doing so reduced his run opportunity for the inning. It’s great to bunt a guy over if you need a run to tie, or take the lead, or even an insurance run in the 8th. But in the 5th inning it makes no sense.

So Trammell wasn’t perfect, Urbina and Percival weren’t good, but neither was the offense. The Tigers only managed 7 hits, six of them singles. And even of the singles, two were fisted bloopers and a third was a ground ball that was moving slow enough for shortstop Jason Bartlett to catch up with it in the outfield. The Tigers didn’t play that well last night, and still had a chance to win it (blow it) against the reigning division champs. Take some solace in that.

Other game thoughts
-Pena continues to have quality at-bats. It doesn’t look like his swing is quite right, and he seems to be falling back toward first base and fouling off some hittable pitches. However, he’s not swinging at bad pitches and now has 9 walks on the season.
– The rest of the team didn’t seem so patient though. I don’t have a count, but it seemed like they were swinging at the first pitch quite often. Rodriguez didn’t seem to be seeing the ball at all as he was swinging at everything. Magglio Ordonez still hasn’t had a hard hit ball.
-Craig Monroe is looking better than I expected in center. He did a nice job tracking down a long fly ball, and made it look easy. Even his throwing error from right was a well thrown, though ill-advised throw. It was right on the base, knee high.

The Indians Series – by the numbers

I’m not sure if I’ll do the by the numbers stuff after every series, but I’ll keep doing it for now. So far it’s easy to compile the stats by just working off of the splits, because the Tigers have only played teams once.

800
That was Carlos Guillen’s batting average on balls-in-play. For the series, Guillen was 4 for 9 – with 4 strikeouts. His only non-strike out came on a pop-up to short.

2.25
Not a bad ERA from the bullpen. Despite Urbina’s rough outing Friday night, the bullpen pitched well. In fact, the two runs allowed by Urbina were the only two runs they allowed in 8 innings of work. Kyle Farnsworth led the way with 3 scoreless innings where he allowed only 2 baserunners while striking out 3.

59
It only took Jeremy Bonderman 59 pitches to get through 5 innings of work on Sunday. Unfortunately it took him 45 pitches to get through the first inning. Despite battling control problems early in the game, and almost getting pulled, Bonderman fought back to finish strong. Of course you never want to spot a team 6 runs, but the fact that Bonderman bounced back the way he did was impressive.

2 for 3
While Rodriguez mowed down all 3 runners in the KC series, the Indians were more successful going 2 for 3 on stolen base attempts. Vance Wilson however is still perfect. He gunned down the only runner who tried to steal on Saturday.

4.67
Fortunately, that wasn’t the team’s ERA. Not that it would be bad, but the ERA was a full run lower at 3.67. Unfortunately, 4.67 is the pitchers’ K/9. Below typical strikeout performances from both Robertson and Bonderman contributed to the low number. Despite the outfield’s strong showing on Saturday, I’m not convinced that the defense is good enough to support a low strike out rate.

Twins On Deck
Fortunately for the Tigers, they’ll miss Johan Santana this series. And with the injury to Carlos Silva, the Tigers will be facing Joe Mays who will be making his first start since the Tigers were chasing records of futility in 2003. The Tigers will be sending out Maroth, Johnson, and Robertson to face Joe Mays, Kyle Loshe, and Brad Radke.

Despite what AL Player of the Week Dmitri Young may say, I still think the Twins are the class of the division – but not by leaps and bounds. They have the best top two pitchers in the division in Radke and Santana. They also have the best closer in the division in Joe Nathan, along with several more formidable bullpen arms. The big quesiton mark is the offense. The bulk of the production is expected to fall on Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau. Mauer has 40 games of MLB experience, is a catcher with questionable knees, and is 22 years old. If he can stay healthy all indications are that he could be spectacular, but those knees make for a large quesiton mark.

Now when it comes to blogs, the Twins are definitely the class of the division. They have the rabid fandom of Bat-Girl. The measured and practical analysis of Twinsgeek. And of course a friend of my blog, Seth at Seth Speaks. Seth touches on all Minnesota sports in a friendly, hanging out with buddies talking sports, conversational sort of way.

Winning big, losing small

So if you had told me that the Tigers would be leading the league in scoring one week into the season, I’d be happy. If you also told me that Tiger pitchers would have 3 times as many strikeouts as walks, and be second in their division in runs allowed I’d be really happy. And if you told me the Tigers record was 3-3, well not so happy.

One week into the season, and the Tigers possess the best run differential in the American League, and a .500 record. In the Tigers’ 3 wins they outscored their opponents by 23 runs. In the 3 losses, they were outscored by 8 runs. Now a 3-3 record isn’t bad, but it isn’t as good as it should be – especially considering that the team played pretty good.

Most disappointing was the 4-3 Friday night loss to the Indians. First their was the bullpen collapse, and then failure of the offense to take advantage of miscues. I know that Urbina wants to be a closer, and that he feels more comfortable in high pressure save situations. But as Brian pointed out, outs the 8th of a tie game are as important as outs in the 9th with a 3 run lead.

More disappointing than Urbina giving up the home run, was the Tigers failure to capitalize on Indian miscues. I know that even the best bullpen arms will make mistakes, and fortunately the Tigers offense still had a chance to come back. That chance became even greater when two Indian errors helped to load the bases with one out in the 8th. The Tigers only managed to score one run when Infante was walked with the bases loaded. It is hard to criticize a team for not being able to get timely hits when they lead the league in scoring, but that game was there for the taking.

A 3-3 start in the division isn’t bad, but 4-2 was there for the taking.

Other Thoughts & News From the Weekend

Of course the big news was the Marcus Thames call up. Unfortunately, my site was down yesterday morning so I couldn’t post about it. The Tigers now have 6 outfielders on the big league roster. It will be interesting to see how Trammell divides up the playing time. I’d imagine that once Ordonez gets healthy, Rondell might get a turn or two at DH with the red-hot young spelling Carlos Pena at first base. What I don’t want to happen is Trammell trying to find starts for Higginson.

While you can’t make conclusions from six games, you can make observations. Tram has followed the same pattern with his starters, in keeping in the pitch counts down. While I know he receives some flack for this, I whole heartedly support it. It’s the first week of the season, and the Tigers have invested a lot of money in their bullpen. Why wouldn’t you protect the young arms.

Also, Trammell is moving away from small ball – at least so far. In six games there were only two stolen base attempts and one sacrifice bunt.

Site Update
I’m working on cleaning up the links over in the sidebar. I also put links to the Ernie Harwell interview and took down the salary information. The salary stuff was several months out of date. If and when I get it updated, it will be back up.

I also have to apologize for the site downtime yesterday. Sorry about the inconvenience. It was a problem with my hosting company. Also, if you sent me an email between 7am and 2:30pm yesterday it was lost to cyberspace.

Thanks to all of you who have been stopping by. Hits have grown exponentially over the last few months, and opening day was my highest total ever. I’ll do my best to keep getting content up. As always I’m welcome to any feedback, good or bad (but especially good) so keep the comments and emails coming.

By the numbers – The Royals series

With a sample size of 3 games you can’t make a lot of statistical inferences. But it doesn’t mean you still can’t have fun with the numbers:

2:1
This is the ratio of Nook Logan’s runs scored to plate appearances. Nook managed to score twice despite grounding out in his only plate appearance due to a couple successful pinch running assignments.

4:1
How about that strikeout to walk ratio for Tiger pitchers. Granted, the Royals aren’t the most intimidating lineup, but it was a good job by the staff not giving out free passes. With 24 strikeouts, 30% of the outs came via the K.

3
Unfortunately, this is the number of plays missed by Inge. He chalked up his first error yesterday, and on Wednesday he probably should have had at least one more. Inge will make some dazzling plays, like the barehander on Opening Day. However, I’m still not convinced that he will end up being a big upgrade defensively.

Three is also the number of Royals gunned down on the basepaths. I wrote earlier in the spring how nobody tested Pudge last year, despite the fact his CS% had been dropping. The Royals tested him in this series and Pudge didn’t allow a stolen base.

52
The number of pitches that Carlos Pena saw in his 12 plate appearances. Pena drew 4 walks against only one strikeout. Combined with his 3 hits, Pena was the toughest out for the Tigers during this series.

1
The number of collisions/near collisions between Higginson and the centerfielder. Bobby has always been aggressive on balls to right-center. Often times it has been with good reason as Tiger centerfielders have either been young, or not very good, and Higgy has been the established starter. Typically it only takes a play or two where Higgy will stare down the centerfielder after the play before they start backing off. Now without TV I didn’t see the play in question and I don’t know how it went down. However, I know with 10,000 fans it wasn’t too loud to not hear a call. Higgy has to let Monroe make those plays. From all accounts, Monroe didn’t miss any plays and didn’t hurt them defensively.

Why Bondy is the Man
Yesterday on The Big Show on 1270 Art Regner asked Jeremy Bonderman what he thought about his Opening Day start now that he’s had a couple days to think about it. Bonderman answered, “I’m just kind of glad to have it over with. There are 35 more starts until the playoffs start.” His answer wasn’t arrogant, he just delivered it in the same matter of fact way that he answers every question. If he can keep this up, Detroit will be overflowing with Bonder-love.

TV Time
For those of you missing the Tigers, they start a stretch of 4 consecutive games on TV. It will be the longest stretch this month so get your fix while you can.

So where will the wins come from

My thoughts all along this offseason were that the AL Central was getting better. The Twins will continue to be good, the Indians and Tigers are improving, and the White Sox are …mmmm… the White Sox. While I didn’t count on any of the four aforementioned teams being dominating, I thought they could all be .500 or a couple ticks above. The problem is that there are only so many wins to go around in the Central, and I don’t know how the Central teams will fare outside the division. The Royals aren’t cooperating by actually winning a game, so can the Central actually support 4 teams with winning-ish records?

The chart below shows how the AL Central teams fared against each division

The Twins dominated a weak division, but were basically a .500 team outside the division. The White Sox and Indians fared similarly outside the division, but weren’t able to match the Twins success against their rivals. The Tigers managed to put up a .473 winning percentage in the Central, but only .418 outside. Even the Royals who bolstered a lot of teams’ records across the league managed to not be awful in the Central.

So are the teams records in the Central representative of their talent relative to the rest of the league? And more importantly, has the talent in the Central improved relative to the rest of the league so that they can improve their extra-divisional records?

In terms of player movement, I don’t see a significant surge of talent into the Central. The Tigers picked up Percival from the West and the Indians got Millwood from the NL. The White Sox exchanged players, but I’m not sure that they are better (Dye, Podsednik in, Carlos Lee out). Corey Koskie left for the East, but Boone came into the Central. If there is additional talent from player movement, it isn’t substantial.

For the Central to be substantially better relative to the league this year, it has to come from player development within (kind of a running theme huh?). It’s Jeremy Bonderman, Morneau and Mauer, Martinez and Perralta. If the Central is going to have 4 winning teams, it is the development of these players that is going to swing the balance.